[seqfan] Re: TREE sequence

[Felix Fröhlich]

It is now mentioned in section 'Se' in the index. I am not sure at the
moment in which sequence this could be mentioned as comment. If you have a
suggestion, let me know.

Regards,

Felix

2014-10-20 20:12 GMT+02:00 Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>:

> No, not we could only show the terms 1 and 3
>
> But there is a section in the Index dealing
> with "Sequences which grow too fast to have
> their own entry" (or something like that).
> You could mention it there. What I have done
> with others like it is to mention the sequence as a comment in
> another sequence and refer to the latter in the Index entry.
>
> Best regards
> Neil
>
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Felix Fröhlich <felix.froe at googlemail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a sequence which I think is not yet in the OEIS, but where I am
> not
> > sure whether I should submit it or not. The sequence is called 'TREE
> > sequence' (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruskal%27s_tree_theorem)
> and
> > begins 1, 3. The next term is too large to include in the database, being
> > larger than Graham's number.
> >
> > Should I submit this sequence?
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Felix
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>