[seqfan] Re: [OEIS-EiC] Re: Should "recognized" sequences be added?

M. F. Hasler oeis at hasler.fr
Sun Oct 26 20:34:12 CET 2014


Thank you.
3n^3+3n^2+n  is now (proposed as) oeis.org/A249348
(Sorry for the typo in my earlier mail, should not read ...+1 but +n as above.)

Maximilian

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:
> MFH, I definitely agree these sequences should
> be in the OEIS!
>
> Best regards
> Neil
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Maximilian Hasler wrote:
(typo fixed below, +1 => +k)
>>
>> Dear Eds-in-Chief,
>>
>> when I search for 3k^3+3k^2+k =
>> 7, 38, 111, 244, 455, 762, 1183, 1736
>> OEIS says:
>> "
>> Sorry, but the terms do not match anything in the table.
>> Your sequence appears to be: + 3 x^3 + 3 x^2 + 1 x
>> "
>> (Great !!)
>> I think such sequences (with "small" coefficients) could nonetheless
>> be added with a record of their own, in order to add further formulas,
>> xrefs, and to refer to it.
>> Do you agree?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Maximilian



More information about the SeqFan mailing list