[seqfan] Re: Cumulative multiplication

[David Wilson]

Yeah, well, I'd be surprised if you found any more...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of M. F.
> Hasler
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:12 AM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: Cumulative multiplication
> 
> Congratulations! Great work, Giovanni!
> It is indeed nice when live surprises us -- provided it is a nice surprise as this
> one... :D !
> This came insofar more as a surprise, as I just had proposed this sequence as
> https://oeis.org/draft/A257275 maybe 15 minutes before you sent your
> message.
> 
> Wishing a very nice day to all SeqFans,
> Maximilian
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Giovanni Resta <g.resta at iit.cnr.it> wrote:
> > On 04/19/2015 05:15 AM, David Wilson wrote:
> >>
> >> I would be very surprised if we found any more good numbers.
> >
> >
> > Isn't it nice when life surprises us ?
> >
> > 3682784876146817236992 = p(3682784876146817236992) * p(3682784876).
> >
> >
> > (No other < 10^100. If we allow to multiply digits from both ends of
> > the number, like in
> > 4794391461888 = 8*8*8*(4*7*9*4*3*9*1*4*6*1*8*8*8)*4*7, then the
> non
> > trivial such numbers < 10^100 are 128, 175, 384, 735, 1296, 18432,
> > 34992, 442368, 4128768, 13395375, 13436928, 161243136, 1269789696,
> > 4161798144, 149824733184, 611784327168, 4794391461888,
> > 2877833474998272, 3682784876146817236992.)
> >
> > Giovanni
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/