[seqfan] Re: Question about submission guidelines

Zak Seidov zakseidov at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 20 10:51:03 CEST 2015


 As my "contribution" to reduce the stack
I withdrew all my ( 6 or 7) submissions.
Not that I call anyone to do the same though ;-)
Best,
Zak


>Среда, 19 августа 2015, 12:56 -05:00 от "Bob Selcoe" <rselcoe at entouchonline.net>:
>
>Hi Al,
>
>;-)
>
>I just submitted it and it was immediately published.
>
>Problem is, one might say this about any sequence: If it's important enough 
>to consider submitting it, then submit it.  Which is why there is a problem 
>with the submissions stack.
>
>Maybe not everybody sees this message (in bold red letters at the top of the 
>page) when they attempt to edit or contribute, but I do:
>
>"The submissions stack has been unacceptably high for several months now. 
>Please voluntarily restrict your submissions and please help with the 
>editing. (We don't want to have to impose further limits.)"
>
>Sounds a little ominous; so I figured it might help the community if some 
>guidelines were offered, that's all.
>
>Best,
>Bob
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>From: "Alonso Del Arte" < alonso.delarte at gmail.com >
>Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:43 PM
>To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" < seqfan at list.seqfan.eu >
>Subject: [seqfan] Re: Question about submission guidelines
>
>> My two cents: if it's important enough for you to write a letter of more
>> than a hundred words to SeqFan about it, it's important enough to submit
>> even now.
>>
>> Al
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Neil Sloane < njasloane at gmail.com > wrote:
>>
>>> sure, post it!
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Neil
>>>
>>> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
>>> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
>>> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
>>> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page:  http://NeilSloane.com
>>> Email:  njasloane at gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Bob Selcoe < rselcoe at entouchonline.net >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > (Hi Olivier - no worries if you would rather reply to me individually
>>> than
>>> > post this to the general discussion board)
>>> >
>>> > Hello Seqfans,
>>> >
>>> > I was hoping some of the more seasoned contributors might be able to
>>> > provide a little guidance on what (and what not) to post, given the
>>> > impacted submission stack.
>>> >
>>> > For example, I was intending to contribute a very simple formula for
>>> > A099920 (Fibonacci-Lucas convolution): a(n) = a(n-1) + a(n-2) +
>>> > A000032(n-1) (Lucas numbers).
>>> >
>>> > Though this one isn't earth-shattering, it still seems to me that any
>>> > simple formula for a sequence involving other core sequences might be
>>> > useful, and easy to review.
>>> >
>>> > But I'm reluctant to post it under the current circumstances; 
>>> > especially
>>> > since I have 3 proposed submissions already under review, including a 
>>> > new
>>> > sequence posted 7 weeks ago with substantial activity on it.
>>> >
>>> > So, are these types of submissions still OK?  Any rules-of-thumb to 
>>> > keep
>>> > in mind before offering any more contributions?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Bob Selcoe
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> >
>>> > Seqfan Mailing list -  http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Seqfan Mailing list -  http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Alonso del Arte
>> Author at SmashWords.com
>> < https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte >
>> Musician at ReverbNation.com < http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list -  http://list.seqfan.eu/
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Seqfan Mailing list -  http://list.seqfan.eu/



More information about the SeqFan mailing list