[seqfan] Re: "more" keyword

Reinhard Zumkeller reinhard.zumkeller at gmail.com
Fri Dec 18 08:46:27 CET 2015


correspondingly: "needs a longer b-file", "longer b-file would be welcome"
 ?

Best regards
Reinhard

2015-12-18 4:14 GMT+01:00 Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>:

> well, no.  "more" officially means we need more terms to fill out three
> punched cards
>
> we really need a new keyword "bmore" (or "bore" if
> we want a 4-letter word)
>
> but we aren't adding new keywords these days.
>
> I suggest a simple comment line: "Needs a b-file"
>
> This is something I've thought of myself many times
>
> If we always use the same wording "Needs a b-file" then after a while
> folks will be able to do a search for it when they want to help
>
> Best regards
> Neil
>
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Frank Adams-Watters <
> franktaw at netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Is it legitimate to use the "more" keyword when there are sufficient
> terms
> > in the entry, but more terms are wanted for a b-file?
> >
> > Franklin T. Adams-Watters
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>


More information about the SeqFan mailing list