[seqfan] Re: "more" keyword

[Neil Sloane]

well, no.  "more" officially means we need more terms to fill out three
punched cards

we really need a new keyword "bmore" (or "bore" if
we want a 4-letter word)

but we aren't adding new keywords these days.

I suggest a simple comment line: "Needs a b-file"

This is something I've thought of myself many times

If we always use the same wording "Needs a b-file" then after a while
folks will be able to do a search for it when they want to help

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com


On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Frank Adams-Watters <franktaw at netscape.net>
wrote:

> Is it legitimate to use the "more" keyword when there are sufficient terms
> in the entry, but more terms are wanted for a b-file?
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>