[seqfan] Re: Questions re: editing A098550

[L. Edson Jeffery]

Frank,

I already replied to Bob Selcoe privately, but he is correct about the
first part of my conjecture following from the definition of A098550. The
second part of the conjecture will then (eventually) follow from a proof of
the conjecture that the primes appear in A098550 in their natural order (I
can't recall who originally made that conjecture). So, I deleted the
comment from A098550 since it was a waste of space. I made a remark in the
dialog box, appearing in the history, regarding Bob's observation and gave
the reason for the deletion.

Ed Jeffery