[seqfan] Re: Essentially the same sequences, but newer one has more terms
Frank Adams-Watters
franktaw at netscape.net
Wed Jul 8 05:01:28 CEST 2015
With sequences this old, there is absolutely no question of removing either sequence.
Neither sequence is incorrect.
So, do two things:
1) extend A005047 with values derived from A065825.
2) Add a cross-reference in each sequence to the other sequence. Include the formula below.
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Pratt <Rob.Pratt at sas.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 8:20 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Essentially the same sequences, but newer one has more terms
A005047 Minimal span of set of n elements with no 3-term arithmetic progression.
A065825 Smallest k such that n numbers may be picked in {1,...,k} with no three
terms in arithmetic progression.
A065825(n) = A005047(n) +
1
_______________________________________________
Seqfan Mailing list -
http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list