[seqfan] Re: OEIS historic sequences

[Neil Sloane]

To David Corneth,  I agree with the others who
replied.  Those sequences are too ill-defined
to warrant inclusion!

By the way, you mentioned A211096 and A211099 as sequences that are related
to the OEIS.  I don't think that is true.  Their definitions have nothing
to do with that  OEIS.

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com


On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:02 PM, <israel at math.ubc.ca> wrote:

> Crossrefs change much too often to base a sequence on them.
>
> Cheers,
> Robert
> On Jun 1 2015, David Corneth wrote:
>
>  Hi all,
>>
>> OEIS has some sequences related to itself, for example, A211096 and
>> A211099, but wouldn't it be nice to add some more? I don't know if the
>> information can be found, but how about the following sequences, or even
>> if
>> they are already in OEIS:
>>
>> - Number of sequences in OEIS on the n-th days of its existence.
>> - Days after "birth" of OEIS that sequence A(n) was added
>>
>> Maybe also:
>>
>> - Number of crossrefs of sequence A(n)
>> (to give an idea if it's much used and maybe interesting (though
>> interesting is quite arbitrary))
>>
>> - Flattened: Shortest path from path A(m) to A(n) via crossrefs
>> (This might need some criterion due to for example "adjacent sequence"
>> which might be unrelated)
>> For example, A010000 refs to A070864 which in turn refs to A076566 but
>> A010000 doesn't so R(10000, 75566) is 2.
>>
>> Any thoughts or ideas?
>>
>> Best,
>> David
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>