[seqfan] Re: A001041

[Frank Adams-Watters]

It is correct, and doesn't really need clarification. The offset is 0, so the first term is 12 times the empty product, which latter is 1.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Harvey P. Dale <hpd at hpdale.org>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Sat, Jun 13, 2015 7:07 pm
Subject: [seqfan] A001041


	The definition is "12 times the product of the first n primes," but the first
term is 12 and the first prime is 2.  How should this be corrected or
clarified?
	Best,
	Harvey

_______________________________________________

Seqfan
Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/