[seqfan] Re: A133471

[Hans Havermann]

Making in the original submission four correct terms, a(0) - a(3), and twelve incorrect ones, a(4) - a(15). Here's something marginally interesting: If the first two terms had been 3552 and -863 (making the third term 100), then there would have been instead four incorrect terms, a(0) - a(2) and a(15), and twelve correct ones, a(3) - a(14).


> On Mar 13, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Charles Greathouse <charles.greathouse at case.edu> wrote:
> 
> It looks like there was a mistake at a(4), and it affected the later terms.