[seqfan] Re: Last term?

[Eric Angelini]

> backwards 

... eh, that's a good idea! Never
occured to me before! I'll dig that
concept, thanks Andrew!

Catapulté de mon aPhone

> Le 26 oct. 2015 à 07:48, Andrew Weimholt <andrew.weimholt at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Eric Angelini <Eric.Angelini at kntv.be>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> same as A108718
>> 
>> ... oh, my deepest apologizes to everyone -- I've checked a possible
>> anteriority with the wrong start,
> 
> [...]
> 
>> -- and sorry again for
>> the waste of time :-((
> 
> Not a waste of time, as it reminded us all of a very nice concept.
> I've thought about a backwards version of your sequence...
> 
> start with the max possible number, 999999999, and use the largest unused
> number of 9 or less digits.
> 
> 999999999, 999999998, 999999997, 999999996, 999999995,
> 999999994, 999999993, 999999992, 999999991, 999999989,
> 999999988, 999999987, 999999986, 999999985, 999999984,
> 999999983, 999999982, 99999999, 999999981, ...
> 
> Perhaps someone would like to figure out when this one ends?
> 
> Andrew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/