[seqfan] Re: A089755

[Neil Sloane]

I just added these pink comments to A089755:

So the correct version - which should be a new sequence - will begin 11,
13, 3, 2, 5, 7, 17, 71, 101, 103, ..., and then we can mark this version
"Erroneous version of A_new" and give it keyword "dead".  There should also
be another new sequence starting with 2: 2 3 5 7 11 13 31 101 103 37 71 107
79 ...

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com


On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, OK, I agree. So how about submitting your corrected version as a new
> sequence, and then
> we can flag the original version as an erroneous version of A_new, and
> give it keyword dead
>
> Bob Wilson just sent an email as I was typing this. Bob, can you rescue
> the original version?
> Well, in any case, we need Franklin's better version to be in the OEIS
>
>
> Best regards
> Neil
>
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Frank Adams-Watters <
> franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:
>
>> Maybe; but in fact the values in the database include single-digit values
>> - just not in the first place they could go. That's the problem.
>>
>> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
>> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
>> Sent: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 10:47 pm
>> Subject: [seqfan] Re: A089755
>>
>>
>> Let's not be hasty. I think the intention is that each term should have at
>> least
>> two digits. Let's try to make some small adjustments to the
>> definition so that
>> it matches the terms.
>>
>>
>> That's always been the OEIS policy: when in doubt,
>> preserve the sequence
>> itself .
>>
>>
>> Can you please submit your version as a new
>> sequence, and
>> give cross-references linking them?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Neil
>>
>> Neil J. A.
>> Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
>> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ
>> 08904, USA.
>> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University,
>> Piscataway, NJ.
>> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
>> Email:
>> njasloane at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Frank Adams-Watters
>> <franktaw at netscape.net
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > This sequence does not match its definition
>> (see
>> > https://oeis.org/draft/A089755). There is no definition I can see that
>> it
>> > does follow - it appears to have been miscalculated by hand. What should
>> we
>> > do with it?
>> >
>> > Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> >
>> > Seqfan Mailing list -
>> http://list.seqfan.eu/
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan
>> Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>
>