[seqfan] A276142 and A276143

Lars Blomberg larsl.blomberg at comhem.se
Sat Aug 27 08:08:30 CEST 2016



The two new sequences A276142 and A276143 were approved just now, but the
third one that I had proposed, A276144, is now empty.

If A276144 was deemed redundant and was skipped, I should remove the
references to it in A276142 and A276143.


Or is there another explanation?



/Lars B

More information about the SeqFan mailing list