[seqfan] Re: Another sequence idea: Year of n-th Millennium Prize
njasloane at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 19:39:22 CET 2016
I agree with Giovanni. After 52 years all the interesting
non-mathematical sequences are already in the OEIS.
Of course there will be exceptions, but they will have to
be very special (or very funny).
Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Giovanni Resta <giovanni.resta at iit.cnr.it>
> On 12/12/2016 10:21 PM, Felix Fröhlich wrote:
> here is another idea where I would like to confirm whether this would be
>> okay to submit or not before actually submitting it:
>> "Year of awarding of Millennium prize for the n-th solved Millennium prize
> To be honest, I utterly despise all the sequences whose nature is not
> strictly mathematic.
> So, to summarize my reaction to your latest proposals: no seq. based on
> Korean language, no seq. based on planetary data, no seq. based on Erdos
> numbers, no seq.based on properties of OEIS itself, no seq. based on years
> (prizes, programming languages, etc.).
> Maybe I'm not a good judge, but I think OEIS should refrain from becoming
> a receptacle of trivia and that the non-mathematical sequences already in
> OEIS are enough.
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan