# [seqfan] Re: A279000 and A279001

Neil Sloane njasloane at gmail.com
Thu Dec 15 12:16:12 CET 2016

```Lars,  Thanks for catching those errors.  I have replaced 5 by 11 in the
definitions of A279000 and A279001.  Could you correct the terms?  And then
add an "Extension" line saying "Definition and terms corrected by ..."

(I should have checked the values that they gave, but I admit I trusted
them.)

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Email: njasloane at gmail.com

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Lars Blomberg <larsl.blomberg at comhem.se>
wrote:

>
>
> The names seem to be wrong.
>
> Using the given formulas, the data is not reproduced and the two sequences
> are not each others complement.
>
> Refer to section 2.3 in the paper.
>
> Although not explicitly stated there, I guess that 5 in the formulas should
> be replaced by 11.
>
> Now A279000 and A279001 are complements of each other.
>
> But still, it seems that some values in the paper have been placed in the
> wrong sequence:
>
> A279001 contains 10 = (11*0+1)*11^1-1 that belongs to A279000 with
> (h,j,k)=(0,1,1).
>
> A279000 contains 21 = (11*0+2)*11^1-1 that belongs to A279001 with
> (h,j,k)=(0,2,1).
>
> A279001 contains 32 = (11*0+3)*11^1-1 that belongs to A279000 with
> (h,j,k)=(0,3,1).
>
>
>
> /Lars Blomberg
>
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>

```