[seqfan] Re: 3,29,289,321,...

[Bob Selcoe]

Eric,

I now see that my reply did not consider your initial post (a(n)*[the last 
digit of a(n+1)], etc.) and MF Hasler's reply (one of the hazards of 
truncating threads).  Anyway, if your last post was intended to follow MF's 
reply then please disregard my post.  It obviously is not applicable.

Are you now asking a separate question?

Cheers,
Bob

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Bob Selcoe" <rselcoe at entouchonline.net>
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 12:14 PM
To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Subject: [seqfan] Re: 3,29,289,321,...

> Hi Eric and Seqfans,
>
> Seems kind of random, but:
>
> s(n) = 10*s(n-1)-1 unless a multiple of 9, then s(n) = (10*s(n-1)-1)/9 ???
>
> If so, then S = 
> 3,29,289,321,3209,32089,320889,3208889,32088889,35654321,356543209...
>
> Cheers,
> Bob Selcoe
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Eric Angelini" <Eric.Angelini at kntv.be>
> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 3:41 AM
> To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: 3,29,289,321,...
>
>>
>> The next term is 32089...
>> Pattern in sight?
>>
>>
>>
>>> Le 14 févr. 2016 à 09:51, Eric Angelini <Eric.Angelini at kntv.be> a écrit 
>>> :
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello SeqFans,
>>> S= 3,29,289,321,3209,...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>