[seqfan] Re: A066077

[Neil Sloane]

> Maybe we should mark it "unkn', and enter the corrected values as a new
sequence.

Excellent suggestion!   Robert, can you do that?

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com


On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Frank Adams-Watters via SeqFan <
seqfan at list.seqfan.eu> wrote:

> I have to wonder that the original sequence actually was. Note that it is
> monotonic, so it undoubtedly has some meaning.
>
> Maybe we should mark it "unkn', and enter the corrected values as a new
> equence.
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Sent: Wed, Dec 27, 2017 7:43 pm
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: A066077
>
> I think this is a case where we have to change the data to fit the
> definition.  There's no other solution
>
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>