[seqfan] Re: n X n binary array quasi-packing problem
Rob Pratt
Rob.Pratt at sas.com
Mon Feb 13 18:10:48 CET 2017
Two more:
19 241
20 268
All three of these sequences are well approximated by quadratic polynomials.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Pratt
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 6:42 PM
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Subject: RE: [seqfan] Re: n X n binary array quasi-packing problem
1 0
2 2
3 5
4 9
5 15
6 22
7 31
8 40
9 51
10 64
11 78
12 94
13 111
14 129
15 148
16 170
17 192
18 215
-----Original Message-----
From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of Ron Hardin
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 10:32 AM
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Subject: [seqfan] Re: n X n binary array quasi-packing problem
Can you easily do b=6, horizontal vertical and antidiagonal?
(I prefer antidiagonal because the word avoids implying both diagonals, and also the natural representation is more compact, making caching work better, when that matters.)
rhhardin at mindspring.com rhhardin at att.net (either)
From: Rob Pratt <Rob.Pratt at sas.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 12:08 AM
Subject: [seqfan] Re: n X n binary array quasi-packing problem
A few more terms for b = 4:
1 0
2 1
3 3
4 8
5 11
6 17
7 25
8 32
9 43
10 52
11 64
12 77
13 91
14 108
15 123
16 141
17 160
18 180
19 203
20 224
--
Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list