[seqfan] Re: A serious question about an interesting sequence of primes, A129563

[Ray Chandler]

The M sequence described in section 3 of the paper appears to be A229289, although that sequence has no references to the paper.  

The complement of that M would be 17, 19, 37, 41, 73, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 109, 113, 127, 137, 149... which does not appear to be in OEIS.  

The method for constructing M in section 4 of the paper is much more involved and not as described in definition of A129563.  
Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of Charles
> Greathouse
> Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 10:53 AM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: A serious question about an interesting sequence of
> primes, A129563
> 
> The A-number is A129563.
> 
> Charles Greathouse
> Case Western Reserve University
> 
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The sequence A129583, submitted by J Vos Post, is apparently based on
> > an article on "Carmichael's conjecture" written by  F Smarandache.
> >
> > There is a link in A129563 to a version of the article on the arXiv. I
> > would like to concentrate of the sequence itself, not on the
> > personalities involved. The definition in the entry A129563 had some
> > serious typos which I have corrected.
> >
> > The present definition in A129563 appears to be slightly different
> > from that in the arXiv article.  Could someone check if the OEIS
> > definition does in fact produce the data in A129563, and if possible,
> > generate more terms and perhaps a b-file?
> >
> > PS Concerning A019518: thanks to Max Hasler for pointing out that
> > Crandall and Pomerance use the name "Smarandache-Wellin numbers". I
> > have restored that name.
> >
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
> 
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/