[seqfan] Re: A serious question about an interesting sequence of primes, A129563

[Neil Sloane]

Ray,  That's great.

Since you've read the paper, could you
make the necessary correction to the definition of A129563,
and add a program and more terms, and a b-file?

For A228289, could you add the complement sequence?  I found the definition
confusing, so I rewrote it, hope I got it right. b-files for them both
would also be welcome.



Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com


On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Ray Chandler <rayjchandler at sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

> I have confirmed the method described in section 4 of the paper results in
> the terms listed in A129563.
>
> I have programs for both A129563 and A229289 if you want more terms or
> b-files for those.
>
> The description of the method of generating M in A129563 needs to be
> corrected to that in section 4 rather than section 3.
> Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of Ray
> > Chandler
> > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 12:37 PM
> > To: 'Sequence Fanatics Discussion list' <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> > Subject: [seqfan] Re: A serious question about an interesting sequence of
> > primes, A129563
> >
> > The M sequence described in section 3 of the paper appears to be A229289,
> > although that sequence has no references to the paper.
> >
> > The complement of that M would be 17, 19, 37, 41, 73, 83, 89, 97, 101,
> 103,
> > 109, 113, 127, 137, 149... which does not appear to be in OEIS.
> >
> > The method for constructing M in section 4 of the paper is much more
> > involved and not as described in definition of A129563.
> > Ray
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of
> > > Charles Greathouse
> > > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 10:53 AM
> > > To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> > > Subject: [seqfan] Re: A serious question about an interesting sequence
> > > of primes, A129563
> > >
> > > The A-number is A129563.
> > >
> > > Charles Greathouse
> > > Case Western Reserve University
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The sequence A129583, submitted by J Vos Post, is apparently based
> > > > on an article on "Carmichael's conjecture" written by  F Smarandache.
> > > >
> > > > There is a link in A129563 to a version of the article on the arXiv.
> > > > I would like to concentrate of the sequence itself, not on the
> > > > personalities involved. The definition in the entry A129563 had some
> > > > serious typos which I have corrected.
> > > >
> > > > The present definition in A129563 appears to be slightly different
> > > > from that in the arXiv article.  Could someone check if the OEIS
> > > > definition does in fact produce the data in A129563, and if
> > > > possible, generate more terms and perhaps a b-file?
> > > >
> > > > PS Concerning A019518: thanks to Max Hasler for pointing out that
> > > > Crandall and Pomerance use the name "Smarandache-Wellin numbers". I
> > > > have restored that name.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
> >
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>