[seqfan] Re: Code

[Harvey P. Dale]

	Sometimes I include a Mma program even when there are already Mma programs listed, and my purpose is to demonstrate what I believe to be a better Mma "style." Is it acceptable to include such a "stylistic" program, or are the only criteria simpler or faster?
	Best,
	Harvey

-----Original Message-----
From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of Neil Sloane
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 3:45 PM
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Subject: [seqfan] Re: Code

Hans,  I agree completely.  Good catch.

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com


On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Hans Havermann <gladhobo at bell.net> wrote:

> I presume that the inclusion of code in sequences is to be able to 
> generate/verify/extend that sequence. Simpler and faster is better.
> Browsing the OEIS today I chanced upon this Mathematica code for 
> Fibonacci numbers < https://oeis.org/A000045 >:
>
> Table[Fibonacci[n]^5 - Fibonacci[1 + n] + 3 Fibonacci[n]^4 Fibonacci[1 
> + n] + Fibonacci[n]^3 Fibonacci[1 + n]^2 - 3 Fibonacci[n]^2 
> Fibonacci[1 +
> n]^3 - Fibonacci[n] Fibonacci[1 + n]^4 + Fibonacci[1 + n]^5, {n, 1, 
> 10}]
>
> It's an interesting Fibonacci identity worthy perhaps of mention in 
> the comments (if it isn't already there) but I'm not sure it ought to 
> be where it is.
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>

--
Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/