[seqfan] Re: Sequences cross-linking some astronomical catalogs

[Giovanni Resta]

I totally agree with Sean.

Giovanni


Il 19/05/2017 23:05, Sean A. Irvine ha scritto:
> My vote would be no for this sequence.
>
> In general when I'm adding a new sequence I try to consider whether someone
> else is ever likely to search for it or if it could conceivably come up in
> some other context.
>
> I think this one fails the test.
>
>
>
> On 20 May 2017 at 06:49, Felix Fröhlich <felix.froe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear SeqFans,
>>
>> I've been thinking about some astronomy related sequences, but wonder
>> whether they would be acceptable.
>>
>> Those sequences link some catalogs of astronomical objects to each other.
>> An example is the following:
>>
>> Numbers n such that the n-th astronomical object in the New General
>> Catalogue, NGC n, also has a Messier number.
>>
>> The sequence starts 205, 221, 224, 581, 598, 628, 650, 651, 1039, 1068,
>> 1904, 1912, 1952, 1960, 1976, 1982, 2068, 2099, 2168, 2287, 2323, 2422,
>> 2437, 2447, 2548, 2632, 2682, 3031, 3034, 3351, 3368, 3379, 3556, 3587,
>> 3623, 3627, 3992, 4192, 4254, 4258, 4303, 4321, 4374, 4382, 4406
>>
>> It can be obtained from "List of Messier objects" in Wikipedia. Other
>> sequences relating other astronomical catalogs are possible.
>>
>> I once submitted a similar sequence that was not a list. That sequence was
>> rejected. So I wonder whether this would be acceptable.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Felix
>>
>> --
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/