[seqfan] Re: Next terms?

[Harvey P. Dale]

	The terms, with 3 exceptions, do fit Peter's model, but the terms 41, 1464251, and 68632121 do not. The next two terms to fit Peter's model are 122898851 and 164527151.
	Best,
	Harvey
 

-----Original Message-----
From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of zak seidov via SeqFan
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 2:27 AM
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Cc: zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com>
Subject: [seqfan] Re: Next terms?

Peter,As I vaguely recollect 
you are (very?) close to the clue.Zak


      From: Peter Munn <techsubs at pearceneptune.co.uk>
 To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu> 
 Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 7:41 AM
 Subject: [seqfan] Re: Next terms?
   
On Sun, 21 May, 2017 11:45 am, zak seidov via SeqFan wrote:
> {41, 344231, 1464251, 9646271, 48691151, 53544461,
> 58182011, 68632121, 74656931, 74752571, 92195381}.
> Next terms?I don't know.
> I found it in my old archive  - no code and no explanation...Zak

It looks like p begins a pattern of primes including a symmetrical pattern
of eight primes centred on a prime pair with the other six at intervals of
6.  (This sequence's distribution quickly reminded me if k-tuple patterns
and gcd analysis quickly led to seeing all were 41 or 311 mod 330, which
re-inforced my suspicions.)

Regards,

Peter
   

--
Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/