[seqfan] A030287 et al minor inconsistency
David Wilson
davidwwilson at comcast.net
Wed Nov 8 05:38:54 CET 2017
I'm planning on bringing some consistency to A030287 through A030290, and to
extend their b-files.
A030287 and A030288 start with a(0) =0, A03028 9 and A030290 with a(1) = 0,
I think all should have the same start index, I prefer 0, what think ye?
It would be nice to agree on indexing before I update any b-files.
We also have the weird
A030287(n)^2 = A030288(n) (square elements to get the next sequence)
A030290(n)^3 = A030289(n) (cube elements to get the previous sequence)
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list