[seqfan] Re: A030287 et al minor inconsistency

[Ray Chandler]

A030287-A030290 are simply lists and should have offset 1.
Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of David
> Wilson
> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 10:39 PM
> To: 'Sequence Fanatics Discussion list' <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Subject: [seqfan] A030287 et al minor inconsistency
> 
> I'm planning on bringing some consistency to A030287 through A030290, and
> to extend their b-files.
> A030287 and A030288 start with a(0) =0, A03028 9 and A030290 with a(1) = 0, I
> think all should have the same start index, I prefer 0, what think ye?
> It would be nice to agree on indexing before I update any b-files.
> 
> We also have the weird
> 
> A030287(n)^2 = A030288(n)  (square elements to get the next sequence)
> A030290(n)^3 = A030289(n)  (cube elements to get the previous sequence)
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/