[seqfan] Re: Question regarding submitting potentially duplicated sequence
Ami Eldar
amiram.eldar at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 19:41:41 CEST 2017
Only computational, otherwise I would generate more terms that may help me
decide.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Alonso Del Arte <alonso.delarte at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > In each sequence I can calculate only 5-6 terms due to its high
> complexity.
>
> This "complexity," is it theoretical or computational? In other words, is
> it something that could be helped by someone with more number crunching
> power, or does it require some kind of inspiration to overcome?
>
> Al
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Ami Eldar <amiram.eldar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a general question, but I may be more specific if needed. It
> regards
> > to a couple of sequences that I want to submit.
> >
> > In each sequence I can calculate only 5-6 terms due to its high
> complexity.
> > By searching the terms in OEIS I find a related sequence, but it is not
> > clear that the sequences are the same. In fact, I believe that ultimately
> > the sequences may differ. But still, I may be wrong.
> >
> > It is like highly composite numbers (A002182) and superabundant numbers
> > (A166981) that have the first 19 terms common.
> >
> > What is the OEIS policy with such an issue?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alonso del Arte
> Author at SmashWords.com
> <https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
> Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list