[seqfan] Re: sequence without proof
jstdhr at gmail.com
Mon Oct 23 05:20:15 CEST 2017
I did use superseeker a while back. But this was with hand calculations
that I now see contain an error.
"Greetings from The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences!
> lookup 1 4 7 10 13 18 23 29 35 47 54 60
Report on [ 1,4,7,10,13,18,23,29,35,47,54,60]:
Many tests are carried out, but only potentially useful information
(if any) is reported here."
Sorry about that. I wondered why superseeker's response was essentially "I
have no suggestions for this sequence."
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:
> JS, I didn't follow your definition of
> 1, 4, 7, 10, 15, 18, 23, 29, 35, 40, 47, 54, 60, 68, 75, 83, 90, 99,.
> but it seems to be in the OEIS already - see A274383
> I do wish people would remember the rule: always omit the first couple of
> terms when checking to see if your sequence is new!
> I have to spend a lot time merging duplicates and removing b-files because
> even regular users don't do this. You know who you are!
> Best regards
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 7:13 PM, jnthn stdhr <jstdhr at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 22, 2017 12:30 PM, "jnthn stdhr" <jstdhr at gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...my program starts with k = 1 and increments k by one when T(b,
> k+1) >
> > T(a,k), b > a.
> > I mean T(n, k+1) > T(n, k).
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan