[seqfan] Re: A050279 and A096764 identical?

[israel at math.ubc.ca]

Yes: one of these should be "at least n zeros" and the other "exactly n 
zeros", but from the current Names it's not clear which is which.

Cheers,
Robert

On Sep 2 2017, Felix Fröhlich wrote:

>Dear SeqFans,
>
>the comment in A096764 says the two sequences "will eventually differ". I
>do not understand why that would be the case, as both sequences essentially
>have the same definition. Does this refer to the comment of M. F. Hasler in
>A050279? If so, then I think the definition of A096764 should be adjusted.
>Otherwise, A096764 seems to be a duplicate of A050279.
>
>Best regards
>Felix Fröhlich
>
>--
>Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>