[seqfan] Re: Bad pdf file in A002369?

[Hugo Pfoertner]

The downloads of both files work, but there is another problem. The scanned
copy of the article is almost unreadable and even applying the usual tricks
in image restoration (gamma curve, contrast, sharpening filters, etc.)
don't produce a satisfactory result. The main problem is the image format
Neil had used, which seems to have been jpeg. This produced the well known
artifacts of "Fourier blocks". Assuming Neil's archive is well organized,
I'd like to ask him if he can redo the scan and use a better suited image
format for storing (e.g. gif or png)? Also Adobe Acrobat has a scan
function producing "clean" results.

Hugo Pfoertner

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 5:13 AM, Alonso Del Arte <alonso.delarte at gmail.com>
wrote:

> It works fine for me, I tried it in Firefox and Opera under Windows 8. What
> browser and operating system are you using, Jonathan?
>
> Al
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:35 PM, Sean A. Irvine <sairvin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The download works for me.  It is a single page PDF.
> >
> >
> > On 24 February 2018 at 06:31, jnthn stdhr <jstdhr at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > When I try to download "Illustration of initial terms" from A0002369 it
> > > fails.  Is this my problem or a bad file?
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > --
> > > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alonso del Arte
> Author at SmashWords.com
> <https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
> Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>