[seqfan] Re: New sequence

[Frank Adams-watters]

There is a feeling among many of the editors that we have too many sequences of this type.

That said, this one is quite clever, and IMO is worthy of inclusion.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters


-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Havermann <gladhobo at bell.net>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Mon, Jul 23, 2018 12:22 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Re: New sequence

> 15 13 14 21 24 72 94 74 113 115 121 171 122 150 131 142 127 147 124 129
> 159 138 135 153 137 156 126 125 128 165
After your clarifications, I find that your 7th term, 94, should be 76.

> Are this sequences of interest to the Oeis?

They are interesting to me and we have many similar sequences in the OEIS.

--Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/