[seqfan] Re: UBASIC

[Alonso Del Arte]

For what it's worth, I used Microsoft QBasic many years ago. I don't recall
having ever needed to use GOTO. QBasic had a primitive IDE that allowed a
fair measure of structured procedural programming, as opposed to spaghetti
code.

While we're on the topic, there seems to be some inconsistency on how to
indicate line numbers and linebreaks in UBasic in the OEIS. Take a look at
the top three results for "UBasic", there seems to be three different
approaches.

Al

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:55 AM <michel.marcus at free.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Does anyone still uses ubasic ? I'm asking because I have translated some
> code in pari/gp by Yasutoshi (zbi74583_boat) and I don't get same results.
> Probably my mistake.
>
>
> Thanks
> Michel
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>


-- 
Alonso del Arte
Author at SmashWords.com
<https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>