[seqfan] Re: Goldbach-Yamada conjecture: a(n) > 0 for n >= 6.

[Ami Eldar]

Dear Yuri,
By "Goldbach-Yamada conjecture" do you refer to the paper "Explicit Chen's
theorem" by Tomohiro Yamada
(https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03409)?
Thanks.

On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 1:34 PM David Sycamore via SeqFan <
seqfan at list.seqfan.eu> wrote:

> Dear Seqfan’s,
>
> Mr Joerg Arndt (AKA “jj” ) is often “bothered” by the way people express
> themselves here, and in the pages of the oeis, and shows no restraint on
> the language he uses to express himself about it.
>
> Thus, on 17/12 he referred to the “stupidity” of some “bone headed”
> contributors whose codes he does not like, and today he launches a
> sarcastic attack on a person who wrote a message here seeking interest in
> some remarks concerning the Goldbach conjecture.
>
> In this case a polite question for clarification might be more “efficient”
> (another term favoured by Mr “jj”) than a “helpfully” and widely
> distributed insult.
>
> I also did not fully understand what Yuri Gerasimov was talking about but
> I would like to defend his right to have his say here without being sneered
> at.  Furthermore I did find his remarks interesting, although the work of
> Yamada is unknown to me.
> In any case I was ready to grant him the benefit of any doubt, especially
> as English is clearly not his mother tongue.
>
> Perhaps the Moderator here, or indeed some Senior oeis editors should
> discourage the use of inappropriate language and insist that users check
> whether their messages are polite and respectful before sending them to a
> list with many subscribers?
>
> I suggest that there  should be  “No excuses” (another jj- ism) for
> unpleasant  behaviour here, unless of course the oeis wishes to create and
> extend a hostile environment for its contributors.
>
> Best regards
>
> David Sycamore.
>
>
>
> > On 4 Jan 2019, at 17:41, Joerg Arndt <arndt at jjj.de> wrote:
> >
> > What about checking whether your message makes any sense whatsoever
> > before sending it to a list with many subscribers?
> >
> > Helpfully yours,  jj
> >
> > * юрий герасимов <2stepan at rambler.ru> [Jan 01. 2019 14:59]:
> >> Where a(n): 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 4, 4, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2, 4,
> ... is
> >> the number of products of 2 successive primes of the form 2*n-(some
> prime) and
> >> 2*n-(some semiprime). This conjecture represents the strengthening of
> Goldbach's
> >> conjecture and the explict version of Yamada's teorem (2015). Dear
> SeqFans, the
> >> proposed reformulation is useful or useless? Thanks You.
> >>
> >> P.S. a(3) = 1 because if 2*3-3(some prime)=3 and 2*3-4(some
> semiprime)=2 then
> >> 3*2=6;
> >>
> >> a(4) = 1 because if 2*4-5(some prime)=3 and 2*4-6(some semiprime)=2
> then 3*2=6;
> >>
> >> a(6) = 1 because if 2*6-7(some prime)=5 and 2*6-9(some semiprime)=3
> then 5*3=15;
> >>
> >> a(7) = 2 because if 2*7-11(some prime)=3 and 2*7-9(some semiprime)=5.
> >>
> >> 2*7-7(some prime)=7 and 2*7-9(some semiprime)=5 then 3*5=15, 7*5=35, ...
> >>
> >> EXAMPLE
> >>
> >> Triangle begins:
> >>
> >> --
> >> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>