# [seqfan] Re: Need proof that Kimberling's A26185 = A198173

Don Reble djr at nk.ca
Sun Feb 2 02:42:48 CET 2020

```> A026185 =? A198473 is an open question. ... Could someone find a proof?

---

Starting with A026136 (where a(1)=1),

> %N A026136
>   for n >= 2, let L=n-[ n/2 ], R=n+[ n/2 ];
>   then a(L)=n if a(L) not yet defined, else a(R)=n

If n = 2m-1: L = (2m-1)-(m-1) = m.
If n = 2m  : L =  2m   - m    = m; R = 2m+m = 3m.
So 2m never goes to position a(L)=a(m): 2m-1 or some smaller number
fills that slot. In fact 2m -> a(3m), since no smaller number has that
R value.

Modulo 6:
6m+1 -> a(3m+1) or a(9m+1)
6m+3 -> a(3m+2) or a(9m+4)
6m+5 -> a(3m+3) or a(9m+7)
We see that 3m+2 is never a R-index, so 6m+3 -> a(3m+2).

That resolves the multiples of 3: 6m -> a(9m), 6m+3 -> a(3m+2).

---

Those multiples of 3 define A026184:

> %N A026184 a(n) = (1/3)*s(n),
>    where s(n) is the n-th multiple of 3 in A026136.

In A026136, the triples are at positions a(9m+2), a(9m+5), a(9m+8), a(9m+9).
(There is no a(0), so I changed 9m to 9m+9.)
The corresponding A026136 values are 18m+3, 18m+9, 18m+15, 6m+6,
and the (1/3) values (A026184) are 6m+1, 6m+3, 6m+5, 2m+2.

So for A026184, a(4m+1) = 6m+1, a(4m+2) = 6m+3, a(4m+3) = 6m+5;
a(4m+4) = 2m+2 (and so a(4m) = 2m).

---

A026185 is the inverse permutation to A026184.
Is A198473 also that inverse permutation?

> %N A198473 If n even, then 2n. If n odd, then nearest integer to 2n/3.
> %F A198473 a(2n)=4n ; a(6n+1)=4n+1 ; a(6n+3)=4n+2 ; a(6n+5)=4n+3.

That formula suggests yes, but let's prove it.

If n is even (n=2m):
A026184[A198473(n)] = A026184[2n] = A026184[4m] = 2m = n.
If n is odd (n=6m+{1,3,5}):
The nearest integer to 2n/3 = 4m+{1,2,3}.
A026184[A198473(n)] = A026184[4m+{1,2,3}] = 6m+{1,3,5} = n.
QED

--
Don Reble  djr at nk.ca

```