[seqfan] Re: Possible duplication

[Neil Sloane]

I think in this particular case we can keep all three versions (you forgot
A023532!).
The important thing is to make sure this is mentioned in the
cross-references section.  So I added

Essentially the same sequence as A114607 <https://oeis.org/A114607> and
A123110 <https://oeis.org/A123110>. - N. J. A. Sloane
<https://oeis.org/wiki/User:N._J._A._Sloane>, Feb 07 2020

to A023532, with similar cross-refs for the other two..

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com



On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:57 AM Allan Wechsler <acwacw at gmail.com> wrote:

> Except for offset, I think A123110 and A114607 are identical. What do we do
> in a situation like this? The change in offset suggests different
> interpretations.
>
> Both sequences go 1010110111011110111110 ... Except for the initial hiccup,
> each run of 1's is one longer than the previous.
>
> (I discovered this when looking for 0010110111011110111110 ..., identical
> except for the leading zero, which I think is mathematically simpler, but
> turns out not to be in OEIS at all.)
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>