[seqfan] Re: Palindrome Product Mystery

Hans Havermann gladhobo at bell.net
Wed Feb 19 22:02:43 CET 2020

"This may just have been a programming mistake."

Indeed. The missing values added to my original output means that there are a lot more of these numbers! So I should be looking at palindromes that *can* be expressed as the product of two >1 palindromes (because they appear to be somewhat rarer). My apologies. I'll shut up now.

More information about the SeqFan mailing list