[seqfan] Re: Remeven numbers

[Neil Sloane]

the remodd numbers do not seem especially rare: I get

43, 47, 73, 87, 223, 227, 253, 267, 283, 289, 337, 343, 349, 367, 379, 397,
433, 439, 463, 467, 469, 477, 489, 493, 523, 553, 583, 643, 647, 649, 669,
673, 677, 687, 689, 733, 747, 787, 799, 823, 827, 829, 849, 853, 869, 883,
887, 889, 943, 997,...

- does anyone agree?  Both should be added to the OEIS, I think.


Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com



On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 9:34 PM Éric Angelini <eric.angelini at skynet.be>
wrote:

> Hello SeqFans,
> A remeven number is a positive integer
> such that when divided successively
> by all its digits the remainder is always
> even:
> S = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,18,22,24,26,28,32,...
> (no zero digit allowed in n, of course)
> The  remodd numbers, like 73, are less
> common, I guess.
> Best,
> É.
> É.
> Catapulté de mon aPhone
>
>
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>