[seqfan] Re: Longest substring is n

[Éric Angelini]

> It doesn't strike 
... agree!
Best,
É.
See more seqs here, between the sausages,
click on the word "maths":
http://cinquantesignes.blogspot.com/



> Le 14 janvier 2020 à 19:13, Hans Havermann <gladhobo at bell.net> a écrit :
> 
> 
> EA: "Is this seq worth computing and submitting?"
> 
> I think that most of the terms are going to be concatenations of adjacent integers except for a few where a slightly smaller number will suffice: ..., 571572, 572573, 573574, 57574, 575576, 576577, 577578, ... It doesn't strike me as particularly interesting.
> 
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/