[seqfan] Re: A111456 vs. A256112

Neil Sloane njasloane at gmail.com
Wed May 27 08:27:07 CEST 2020

Excellent comments, both of you!

Hans, as an old friend can I ask you you to update both A111456 and A256112
accordingly?  Thanks!

Best regards

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:02 AM Elijah Beregovsky <
elijah.beregovsky at gmail.com> wrote:

> The difference is that A256112 is a looser restriction, as the whole
> number (which is pandigital in base b) doesn’t have to be divisible by b,
> the last digit is just chosen so that the number is pandigital. And in
> A111456 it has to be divisible by b, so A111456 might be finite and A256112
> is probably not.
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/

More information about the SeqFan mailing list