[seqfan] Re: Editing several sequences related to A002405

[Neil Sloane]

Jack,  sorry for delay in replying. Yesterday was hectic.

You said (MY ANSWERS IN CAPS)

- could I temporarily have permission to edit drafts of more than 3
sequences, so that I can work on all these sequences at once? I have an
active draft for A002405, and there are 8 related sequences I would like to
edit. I RAISED YOUR LIMIT, THANKS FOR YOUR HELP

- is it preferable to upload the pdf somewhere and add a link, or add it
directly to the encyclopedia entries as a file? It has citations and the
format of a mathematical paper, but I don't intend to publish elsewhere and
it's not clear that it would be of general interest - it is specifically
intended to clarify the entry and justify the calculation of more terms.
UPLOAD IT ONCE , ATTACHED TO  ONE SEQUENCE, THEN edit the link,
which will then say something like
Jack W Grahl, href="/A268076/a268076.pdf">Your title</a>
and use exactly the same link in the other sequences


- if the latter, should I add it to each entry, or just to one, and make
sure the other sequences mention that entry?
- same questions for the Python code. Upload or link? Upload to all entries
or just one?
SAME ANSWER: UPLOAD ONCE, COPY LINK IN OTHER ENTRIES

- some of these sequences are given in the encyclopedia as all positive,
but in their actual definition they are all negative. Should sequences like
this be edited or left as they are?
LEAVE THEM AS THEY ARE.  NORMALLY the definition would say something linke
Numbers which are red and green (negated).

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com



On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 7:24 AM Jack Grahl <jack.grahl at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have done some work on the sequences A002397-A002406 and A260780-1. The
> outcome is that I have additional terms for almost all of these sequences.
> I also have a pdf file where I've written some information untangling
> exactly what the definition of these sequences is, and how they are related
> to similar sequences in other works. The Python file that I wrote is quite
> long, has several functions reused between different sequences and would
> probably be better uploaded as a file than copy-pasted directly into
> encyclopedia entries.
>
> With this in mind:
> - could I temporarily have permission to edit drafts of more than 3
> sequences, so that I can work on all these sequences at once? I have an
> active draft for A002405, and there are 8 related sequences I would like to
> edit.
> - is it preferable to upload the pdf somewhere and add a link, or add it
> directly to the encyclopedia entries as a file? It has citations and the
> format of a mathematical paper, but I don't intend to publish elsewhere and
> it's not clear that it would be of general interest - it is specifically
> intended to clarify the entry and justify the calculation of more terms.
> - if the latter, should I add it to each entry, or just to one, and make
> sure the other sequences mention that entry?
> - same questions for the Python code. Upload or link? Upload to all entries
> or just one?
> - some of these sequences are given in the encyclopedia as all positive,
> but in their actual definition they are all negative. Should sequences like
> this be edited or left as they are?
>
> In case it helps, the pdf is at
> https://github.com/jwg4/numerical/blob/main/code/output/A002402.pdf and
> the
> python code is at
> https://github.com/jwg4/numerical/blob/main/code/A002405.py
>
> Thanks in advance for your guidance!
>
> Best, Jack Grahl
>
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>