[seqfan] Re: A long-lost paper by Verma
Sean A. Irvine
sairvin at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 20:55:10 CEST 2021
Very nice, I will be able to remove an ugly kluge I have long had in my
code for A012249(9).
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 05:08, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:
> Richard, Thank you for those changes. The trouble is, this leaves A12250
> in limbo. Also it appears to blame Verma for the error(s) in A012249,
> which may possibly have been my fault because I based A012249 on Verma's
> values for A012250.
> The values Verma shows for A012249 are correct.
> I think the best way to handle this is to correct A012249, using your
> values, comments, program, etc., from A348212.
> I'll leave A013561 and A348211 the way you have them.
> I'll be editing all of these entries once I have had more coffee.
> Best regards
> Neil J. A. Sloane, Chairman, OEIS Foundation.
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 7:45 AM Richard J. Mathar <mathar at mpia-hd.mpg.de>
> > I added A348210 and declared A012249 to be an erroneous version of
> > and A013561 to be an erroneous version of A348211 (typographic errors in
> > the
> > terms).
> > This uncovered a row sum formula connection between the two corrected
> > triangles/sequences.
> > --
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan