[seqfan] Re: conjectured equality of sequences

Neil Sloane njasloane at gmail.com
Wed Apr 27 16:16:17 CEST 2022

My personal preference is for one entry, whose definition would be the
simplest of the alternatives,
and then a comment giving the conjectured alternative definition.

However, if both sequences already exist as separate entries in the OEIS,
and both come with a lot of baggage,
then perhaps we should keep both entries.

For a new entry, just a single entry is enough.

Best regards

Neil J. A. Sloane, Chairman, OEIS Foundation.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University,
Email: njasloane at gmail.com

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:27 AM Brendan McKay via SeqFan <
seqfan at list.seqfan.eu> wrote:

> If we have two sequence with completely different definitions,
> equal in at least 37 terms and conjectured to be equal always,
> should we have two entries with cross-references, or a single
> sequence with a note on the conjecture?
> Brendan.
> --
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/

More information about the SeqFan mailing list