[seqfan] Re: Binary Complement Sequences

[Tom Duff]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:22 AM Tom Duff <eigenvectors at gmail.com> wrote:

> I haven't actually finished computing 819991, but it is known to be one
> less than 425720. I'm letting it run as a check on 425720.
>
That wasn't completely clear. I'm letting it run to verify that my number
for 425720 wasn't wrong due to an unrepeatable hardware glitch. It was
still on track after 5B iterations. It's at 20B now, should be done in
about 5 days.