[seqfan] Re: A325799 = "Signature excitation" of n?

Emmanuel Vantieghem emmanuelvantieghem at gmail.com
Mon Oct 10 13:00:08 CEST 2022

Dear sir,

> In my opinion A325799 does not give the signature exitation (called
> "siex"  in the sequel) of n.

For instance :
A325799(9) = 2, while the siex of  9  is 1
A325799(20) = 0  while the siex of 20 is 1
And there are many other counter examples.

Sincere greetings.

Emmanuel Vantieghem.

More information about the SeqFan mailing list