[seqfan] Hanna's table A322210 expanded and condensed again gives ... R. Zumkeller's A156145, duh? who ordered that?
Wouter Meeussen
wouter.meeussen at telenet.be
Thu Mar 9 21:51:37 CET 2023
how weird can it get?
A156145 = 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 31, 46, 68, 98, ...
Number of partitions of 9*n-8 into parts having in decimal
representation digital root 1.
alias A010888(9*n-8) = 1;
but then, that A010888 = Digital root of n (repeatedly add the digits of
n until a single digit is reached).
Is this numerology or Number Theory? I'll show the connection below.
And now for something (apparently) completely different:
Hanna's A322210 is the 2-dim coefficientlist of x,y in
prod(n=0,N; 1/(1 - ( x^n + y^n) ) )
An old trick to decompose the entries in the table is to parametrise like
prod(n=0,N;1/(1 - (l[n] x^n + l[n] y^n)) )
where I choose the dummy variable l ('el') for its typographical
compactness.
The 'expanded' table then starts like:
1 l(1) l(1)^2+l(2) ...
l(1) 2 l(1)^2 3 l(1)^3+l(2) l(1)
l(1)^2+l(2) 3 l(1)^3+l(2) l(1) 6 l(1)^4+2 l(2) l(1)^2+2 l(2)^2
...
remark that setting all l(..) equal to 1 reverts to A322210
each entry above can be read as a polynomial of partition valued functions :
f{} f{1} f{1,1}+f{2}
f{1} 2f{1,1} 3f{1,1,1}+f{2,1}
f{1,1}+f{2} 3f{1,1,1}+f{2,1} 6f{1,1,1,1}+2f{2,1,1}+2f{2,2}
...
thes expressions get very unwieldly, but if we choose the Schur function
in the role of 'f', then this verbose expanded table condenses again
nicely to:
1 chi(1,1) chi(2,1) chi(3,1) ...
chi(1,1) chi(2,1)+chi(2,2) chi(3,1)+chi(3,2) chi(4,1)+chi(4,2) ....
chi(2,1) chi(3,1)+chi(3,2) chi(4,1)+chi(4,2)+chi(4,3)
chi(5,1)+chi(5,2)+chi(5,3) ...
... ... ... chi(6,1)+chi(6,2)+chi(6,3)+chi(6,5) ...
or
*table( i=1..n,j=1..n ; sum(chi(i, A156145( min(i,j) ) ) )*
and chi( a,b ) is the list of characters in row b of the symmetric group
of size a.
(Could be called 'decomposition into orthonormal Schur components' or
sumptin like that)
Example:
chi(4,1)+chi(4,2)+chi(4,3) equals
{1, 1, 1, 1, 1}+{-1, 0, -1, 1, 3}+{0, -1, 2, 0, 2} = {0, 0, 2, 2, 6}
0*f{4}+0*f{3,1}+2*f{2,2}+2*f{2,1,1}+6*f{1,1,1,1}
as in row 3 column 3 of the 'polynomial of partition valued functions'.
Who in his right mind expected such simple decomposition in terms of
characters,
and who saw the relevance of A156145 coming from afar? I didn't.
All the above was checked up to T(10,10).
Wouter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
pro memori : WARNING
Mathematica code beyond, (slippery even when dry)
w = 10;
it1 = Expand at CoefficientList[
Series[Product[1/(1 - (l[n] x^n + l[n] y^n)), {n, w}], {x, 0,
w}, {y, 0, w}], {x, y}];
it2 = it1 //. l[u_]^(k_) :> l[Sequence @@ Table[u, k]] //.
l[u__] l[v__] :> l[u, v] /. l[li__] :> s at Reverse[Sort[{li}]] /.
s[pa__] :> s^rankpartition[pa];
it3 = Map[Rest at CoefficientList[#, s] &, it2, {2}];
it4 = MapIndexed[q[#1, Tr[#2] - 2] &, it3, {2}];
it5 = it4 /.
q[u : {__},
i_] :> ( Map[chars, Partitions[i]]. (cycleclasses[i]/i! u)).
Array[Subscript[\[Chi], i], PartitionsP at i]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list