<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.0.6487.1">
<TITLE>Re: A062679: Something's wrong</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV>Yes, such a SEQ is also of interest!</DIV>
<DIV>Are you going to submit it, Bob?</DIV>
<DIV>Zak</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT size=2>-----Original Message----- <BR><B>From:</B> Robert G. Wilson
v [mailto:rgwv@rgwv.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Fri 5/6/2005 8:39 PM <BR><B>To:</B>
זקיר סעידוב - ד"ר/Zakir Seidov Ph.D. <BR><B>Cc:</B> Michele Dondi;
seqfan@ext.jussieu.fr <BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: A062679: Something's
wrong<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>Or how about the sequence "Numbers n which are not prime which
have the digit 9 in<BR>its divisors except 1. 1691 is the first such
entry.<BR><BR>Bob.<BR><BR>זקיר סעידוב - ד"ר/Zakir Seidov Ph.D.
wrote:<BR>> Sorry,<BR>> sure 9 and 81 are not OK, because they have
divisors (3, 27) not<BR>> containing 9;<BR>> 1691=89*19 is the least
non-prime number in A062679.<BR>> so it's OK with entries and name and
examples in A062679<BR>> (and Neil,<BR>> I guess I may send my sequence
"primes with maximal digit = 9"<BR>> with comment: "first differs from
A062679 in 1691, or smth like").<BR>><BR>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>> From: Michele Dondi
[<A
href="mailto:blazar@pcteor1.mi.infn.it">mailto:blazar@pcteor1.mi.infn.it</A>]<BR>>
Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 4:51 PM<BR>> To: זקיר
סעידוב - ד"ר/Zakir Seidov Ph.D.<BR>> Cc:
seqfan@ext.jussieu.fr<BR>> Subject: Re: A062679:
Something's wrong<BR>><BR>> On Fri, 6 May 2005,
[utf-8] ~Vק~Yר סע~Y~S~U~Q -
~S\"ר/Zakir<BR>> Seidov Ph.D.
wrote:<BR>><BR>>
> something's wrong with
A062679:<BR>>
> enties are all "primes with maximal
digit = 9"<BR>>
> (which I wished to
submit?!),<BR>>
> while name and example say quite
other things<BR>>
> (why e.g. are 9, 81,...
absent?)<BR>><BR>> Do 9, 81,... happen to be
primes?<BR>><BR>><BR>>
Michele<BR>>
--<BR>> >What is the current status of
chaos theory? A decade ago it was<BR>>
supposed<BR>> >to be The Next Big
Thing.<BR>> Yeah, well, that kind of thing is
notoriously hard to predict, longterm.<BR>> - Lee
Rudolph in sci.math, "Re: Chaos
Theory?"<BR>><BR></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>