games born on day n
Richard Guy
rkg at cpsc.ucalgary.ca
Thu Nov 22 16:38:53 CET 2001
Dean is quite right, and there should be two sequences.
All games are `born again' each day after their birthday.
David Wolfe, Dan Calistrate & Marc Paulhus have
shown that (all) the games born on day n form a
distributive lattice. A paper will appear in
More Games of No Chance, the proceedings of the
2000 Workshop at eMiSaRI.
Newborn games: 1 3 18 1452 ...
Games: 1 4 22 1474 ...
The number of levels in the lattice (another
recordable sequence?)
1 3 9 45 2949 ...
is one more than twice the (total) number
of games born on the previous day.
Best, R.
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Dean Hickerson wrote:
> > Will some fanster put this into the approved
> > shape for Neil ? Thanks!
>
> I'll do it in a few days if noone does it first. (I don't have my
> references handy at the moment.)
>
> > The following is the sequence of numbers of games
> > born on days 0, 1, 2, 3.
>
> That should probably be "on or before". E.g. the 4 games on day 1 include
> the one from day 0 and 3 new ones. Perhaps the sequence (1 3 18 1452) that
> counts the new ones on day n should also be included.
>
> > 1 4 22 1474
>
> For what it's worth, Robert Li and I also counted 1474 games on day 3 when
> we were grad students at Berkeley in 1974. We were working without a
> computer, and made no attempt to count the day 4 games.
>
> Dean Hickerson
> dean at math.ucdavis.edu
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list