Lookup Modification #4

[Leroy Quet]

I like the "*" idea. It would be useful if you knew the order that terms 
occurred in, but not if you were missing any or how many.
(So * could possibly be zero terms missing.)

Thanks,
Leroy Quet


>Et al,
>
>Yes, I would like that idea of a wild-card ? for one entry and possible 
>* for multiply entries.
>
>Bob.
>
>Leroy Quet wrote:
>
>>One last idea:
>>
>>A standard sequence-lookup where we can enter a wild-card integer, such 
>>as "?", for terms we are uncertain of.
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Leroy Quet
>> 
>>
>>  
>>
>
>