"See also:"

[Richard Guy]

The difficulty I see with this is that `see also'
isn't symmetric.  It may be of interest that some
sequences are connected with binomial coefficients,
but it would swamp the reader if one referenced
the hundreds (?) of such sequences under the
sequence of binomial coefficients  [not a v g eg,
'cos that's a triangle, but you see what I mean].

R.

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Rob Pratt wrote:

> I don't know how difficult it would be to implement, but I think a nice feature of the database would be to automatically make the "See also" references symmetric in the following sense.  If the "See also" line in sequence X refers to sequence Y, then the "See also" line in sequence Y refers to sequence X.  I think this feature would make the database more navigable, and it would also make entering new cross references half as cumbersome.
> 
> Rob Pratt
>