An application for zeroless squares
Paul C. Leopardi
leopardi at bigpond.net.au
Sat Apr 30 04:56:30 CEST 2005
Thanks Gordon,
I think that clears it up for me.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:23 pm, Gordon Royle wrote:
> If it were a crossword, then there would be 2 x n rather boring clues...
...
> The "not starting with zero" comes from this line in the original
> description...
>
> >> Important for solving this puzzle is to omit zeros at the first
> >> position.
>
> Just as in a crossword, where one letter goes in each square, we are
> allowed one digit per square only...
...
> (It took me a few minutes to unpack it all as well..)
OK, so in binary, there is only one solution for 1 x 1, and no solutions for
n>1 since there are no squares of the form 2^n-1 for n>1.
In ternary, we have
1
1 1
1 1
Any other solutions? Probably very few?
In octal, we have at least
1
4
1 1
1 1
3 1
1 1
4 4
4 4
6 1
1 1
Any others? Probably very many?
In base m^2-1, we always have
1
1 1
1 1
since m^2 is represented as 11 in base m^2-1.
MIME-Version: 1.0
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list